Wireline Competition Bureau Chief Sharon Gillett explains the draft rules under consideration in the Open Internet NPRM. She also explains more generally the FCC rule-making process at work.
Wireline Competition Bureau Chief Sharon Gillett explains the draft rules under consideration in the Open Internet NPRM. She also explains more generally the FCC rule-making process at work.
Although those posting entries may choose to provide identifying information or may comment anonymously, anonymous comments will not be part of the record in this proceeding and accordingly will not be relied on by the Commission in reaching its conclusions in this rulemaking. The Commission will not rely on anonymous postings in reaching decisions in this matter because of the difficulty in verifying the accuracy of information in anonymous postings. Should posters provide an e-mail address, they should be aware that although such information will not be posted on the blog, it will be publicly available for inspection upon request.
A confirmation e-mail will be sent to you shortly, and will require validation for your comment to be submitted as part of the public record.
If you have any questions or concerns, please read more about our privacy policy below or contact newmedia@fcc.gov.
Privacy Policy: Although those posting entries may choose to provide identifying information or may comment anonymously, anonymous comments will not be part of the record in this proceeding and accordingly will not be relied on by the Commission in reaching its conclusions in this rulemaking. The Commission will not rely on anonymous postings in reaching decisions in this matter because of the difficulty in verifying the accuracy of information in anonymous postings. Should posters provide an e-mail address, they should be aware that although such information will not be posted on the blog, it will be publicly available for inspection upon request.
In order to be useful to the consumer at all, disclosures would need to be in a plain, human-readable format, rather than the meaningless lawyer-speak which is typically what is sent out to consumers as notices. In order for consumers to be able to compare these disclosures against one another, a standardized chart (like food labels) might be way to go.
http://www.google.com says no